Last reviewed: September 2026
IntelligentHQ reports on technology that readers evaluate, buy and build on. A wrong figure, a misattributed research finding or an overstated capability can send someone down the wrong path. We would rather be told we are wrong than leave an error standing. This page explains how to report one and what happens next.
Reporting an error
Email info@ztudium.com with Correction in the subject line. It helps if you include:
- The URL of the article
- The sentence, figure or claim you believe is wrong
- What the correct information is
- A source we can check it against, where you have one
You do not need to be the subject of the article to report an error, and you do not need to give a reason for asking.
What we treat as urgent
Some errors are corrected ahead of the queue because leaving them up could cause real harm:
- A misattributed research finding, or a statistic credited to an organisation that did not publish it
- A misstated security or privacy characteristic of a product
- Wrong pricing, licensing terms or availability
- A capability claim that overstates what a system actually does
- A missing or incorrect commercial disclosure
We aim to fix these within one working day of confirming them.
What happens next
- We acknowledge every correction request within two working days.
- We check the claim against its original source. Where the source has since revised its own figure, we say so rather than implying we were always right.
- Other confirmed errors are corrected within five working days.
- Where we conclude the article is accurate, we explain why to the person who raised it.
We correct a factual error regardless of how old the article is.
How we mark changes
- Correction. The article stated something factually wrong. We fix the text and add a dated note at the foot of the article saying what was wrong and what it now says. The note is permanent.
- Clarification. The article was accurate but open to being misread. We adjust the wording and add a dated note.
- Update. The technology, the funding position or the regulation has moved and we have added the new information. The article’s modification date changes and, where the update alters the substance, we say what changed.
We do not silently edit a published article to fix a factual error. Purely typographical fixes — spelling, a broken link, formatting — are made without a note.
Companies we write about
A company disagreeing with our assessment is not the same as an error, and we treat them differently. Where you can show a factual statement is wrong, we correct it. Where the disagreement is with our analysis or conclusion, we will consider publishing your response, but we will not remove the assessment.
Requests to remove an article, delist it from search, or alter it as a condition of a commercial relationship are declined.
Withdrawing an article
We remove an article only where it cannot be corrected: where it is wholly wrong, where publication would breach a legal obligation, or where leaving it up would create a genuine risk to someone’s safety or security. The URL then carries a note saying the article was withdrawn and when.
Right of reply
If you are a company or an individual covered in an article and believe it is unfair or incomplete, write to info@ztudium.com. Where the point is substantive we will either reflect your response in the article or publish it alongside. A right of reply does not depend on having a commercial relationship with IntelligentHQ, and having one does not produce a different outcome.
If you are not satisfied
Reply to the same thread asking for the matter to be escalated to the editor responsible for the title. Escalated complaints are reviewed by someone who was not involved in the original decision.
Contact
info@ztudium.com
Ztudium Group Ltd, London, United Kingdom.